Legal Opinion
Allen v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 12, 1998No. 3:97CV7060PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
CARR, District Judge.
In this breach of contract ease, plaintiff claims that defendant breached an agreement to sell the stock of a Ford-Mercury dealership it owned. Because the parties are diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending are plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 18) and defendant’s ■ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19). 1 For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion shall be denied and defendant’s motion shall be granted.
Background
In April and May, 1995, plaintiff and defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Weiper v. W.A. Hill & AssociatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yacoubou v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. U.S. Bank Trust National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- SMA Portfolio Owner, LLC v. Corporex Realty & Investment, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
- Estate of Battle-King v. Heartland of TwinsburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Eisenberg v. Toledo-Lucas Cnty. Port Auth. (In re BX Acquisitions, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.