Weiper v. W.A. Hill & Associates
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Jerry Weiper, appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer, W.A. Hill & Associates (‘W.A. Hill”), on his claims for breach of contract and age discrimination. In the first of his two assignments of error, Weiper contends that the trial court erred by failing to recognize triable issues of fact precluding summary judgment. Specifically, Weiper contends that the record demonstrates issues of material fact with respect to (1) an express or implied contract for commissions after his termination of employment, (2)…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Atkinson v. International Technegroup, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ekunsumi v. Cincinnati Restoration, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Greenwood v. Taft, Stettinius & HollisterOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sammarco v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.