Legal Opinion
Razeto v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1979No. Civ. 44482PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Emanuel P. Razeto and Minnie P. Razeto have appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their complaint against respondents City of Oakland and East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD).
The complaint sought recovery for property damage resulting from the alleged negligent installation and maintenance of a fire hydrant. Specifically, vandals allegedly turned on a fire hydrant located across the street from appellants’ house. The hydrant, having its spout pointed toward the street, directed a stream of water at appellants’ house, causing damage to the house and its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- DeSuza v. AndersackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Stang v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- DISABLED & BLIND ACTION COMMITTEE OF CAL v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cochran v. Herzog Engraving Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Kerns v. CSE Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Pacific Bell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Varshock v. Department of ForestryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kollander Construction, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.