Legal Opinion

Kollander Construction, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2002No. B155620PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

We issued an order to show cause in this original proceeding and requested briefing on whether Code of Civil Procedure section 1008 is unconstitutional to the extent that it purports to deprive trial courts of their inherent power to reconsider interim rulings. We agree with Division Seven of this district which held in Darling, Hall & Rae v. Kritt (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 1148, 1156 [89 Cal.Rptr.2d 676] that trial courts retain their inherent power notwithstanding the language of section 1008 which provides that compliance with its provisions is jurisdictional. But, we…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kerns v. CSE Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Case v. Lazben Financial Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API