Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Chefline Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 26, 2001No. Slip. Op. 01-118; 00-05-00212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINÍON

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiffs Chefline Corporation, Inc., Daelim Trading Co., Ltd., Dong Won Metal Co., Ltd., Hai Dong Stainless Steel Co., Ltd., Kyung Dong Industrial Do., Ltd., Namyang Kitehenflower Co., Ltd., O’bok Stainless Steel Co., Ltd., and Sam Yeung Industrial Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Chefline”), move for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2, challenging the U.S. International Trade Commission’s (“Commission” or “ITC”) final affirmative determination in the five-year administrative review (“sunset review”) of antidumping and countervailing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Maine Potato Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  4. National Ass'n of Mirror Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  2. NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  3. Nitrogen Solutions Fair Trade Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Wieland Werke, AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API