Legal Opinion
National Ass'n of Mirror Manufacturers v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 25, 1988No. Court 87-04-00592PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DiCARLO, Judge:
The National Association of Mirror Manufacturers (NAMM) moves under Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court for judgment on the agency record to contest the final determinations of the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) that an industry in the United States is not materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of less than fair value imports in Certain Unfinished Mirrors from the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, Portugal, and the United Kingdom, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-321 through 325 (Final), USITC Pub. 1938 (Jan. 1987), and Certain…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Timken U.S. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Granges Metallverken AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Metallverken Nederland B v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Goss Graphics System, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.