Legal Opinion

Nitrogen Solutions Fair Trade Committee v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 31, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-13; Court 03-00260PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior District Judge.

[ITC’s final negative injury and threat determination sustained.]

In this action, Plaintiff Nitrogen Solutions Fair Trade Committee challenges the final negative injury and threat determination of the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in the anti-dumping proceedings involving Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine, 68 Fed.Reg. 18673 (Apr. 16, 2003) (“Notice of Determination”) and USITC Pub. 3591, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1006, 1008, and 1009 (Apr.2003) (“Views of the Commission”) (together, the “Final Determination”).…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Caldwell v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. JMC Steel Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  2. Committee for Fair Beam Imports v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  3. Gold East Paper (JIANGSU) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  4. Mexichem Fluor Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  5. CP Kelco US, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API