Westover v. Bridgford
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a change of venue. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting the motion of certain of the defendants for a change of the place of trial.
The action is one in claim and delivery; and at the time it was commenced in the superior court in the city and county of San Francisco, several of the defendants resided in the county of Siskiyou, and others of them resided without the confines of the state of California. The defendants residing in the county of Siskiyou filed a demurrer to the complaint, accompanying it with an affidavit of merits, and the demand required by section 396 of the Code of Civil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
- Rey v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GetchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Teutonia Loan & Building Co. v. TurrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newport v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. HatchMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Modlin v. Walter's Fur ShopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.