Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Metzner

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1927No. Docket No. 5792PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco abating this action on the ground that when it was commenced there was another action pending in the same jurisdiction, based upon the same cause and contested by the same parties in the trial court, the prior action being numbered 146,986 and that under discussion 146,989. There is no question that the complaint in action 146,986 was filed with the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco prior to the filing of the complaint in action 146,989, both filings being…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Edwards v. GrandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hoyt v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Touchard v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. A & B METAL PRODUCTS v. MacArthur Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. In Re GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Hutchins v. County ClerkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Leeper v. GinsbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API