Legal Opinion

In Re Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 2009No. C056083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

This matter has taken a circuitous route back to this court because of defendant David Earl Gray’s failure to follow the Sacramento County Superior Court’s directions regarding the filing of a notice of appeal from a judgment against him in a criminal case, and the trial judge’s insistence that defendant could not file his notice of appeal with the trial judge’s courtroom clerk instead of with the “Appeals Unit” of the court clerk’s office as directed by the court’s Web site.

The matter was previously before us when, after the jury had returned a verdict finding him…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Fuller v. First Franklin Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. In re RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. DawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Noble v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API