Leeper v. Ginsberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court of Sacramento County terminating appellants’ proceedings to settle a bill of exceptions, on account of a lack of diligence. The bill of exceptions was settled and directed to be engrossed, pursuant to the provisions of section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by a judge who resided outside of the county. The engrossed bill was left with the clerk of said court to be forwarded to the judge for his signature and a copy of that document was served on plaintiff’s attorney the same day. The clerk failed to forward the engrossed bill…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- Andrews v. MetznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Miller v. American Central InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haven v. Ward's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
- Caldwell v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Flint v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Whelpton v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kerley Chemical Corp. v. ColbochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.