Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Roche

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 13, 1926PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a suit in equity. Its aim is to set aside a bilateral contract, by the plaintiff to buy and by the defendant to sell, real estate on the ground that its execution by the plaintiff was procured by the fraud of the defendant, and for incidental relief. The case was heard on its merits on May 13, 1925. On May 18, 1925, the trial judge filed a paper entitled “Findings,” which contained his findings of material facts and a ruling that on those facts the plaintiff was entitled to relief. The defendant filed an appeal from these “findings” on May 20, 1925. Several requests by the defendant…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Lawrence v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Griffin v. GriffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Colonial Development Corp. v. BragdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Kravetz v. LipofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API