Legal Opinion

Colonial Development Corp. v. Bragdon

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 24, 1914PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Contract for a balance alleged to be due upon a contract in writing under seal dated March 11, 1910, to purchase from the plaintiff, for the sum of $200 payable in monthly instalments of $10 each, two lots of land in the town of Islip on Long Island in the State of New York.

Read the full summary

Contract for a balance alleged to be due upon a contract in writing under seal dated March 11, 1910, to purchase from the plaintiff, for the sum of $200 payable in monthly instalments of $10 each, two lots of land in the town of Islip on Long Island in the State of New York. Writ in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston dated June 28, 1911; and Tort by the defendant in the first case against the plaintiff in that case for false and fraudulent representations made to the plaintiff in this action by the agents of the defendant herein, whereby the plaintiff was induced to sign the contract…

1Opinion of the CourtRttgg, C. J.

Bragdon, who hereafter will be referred to as the defendant, entered into a contract in writing with the Colonial Development Corporation, hereinafter called the plaintiff, for the purchase of two lots of land on Long Island in the State of New York, to be paid for in instalments. A description of the land, the terms of payment, the kind of deed to be given, together with a stipulation as to the maximum amount of taxes and assessments for three years, and as to conveyance in case of the defendant’s death before payment in full, and a guaranty that the lots were “high and dry, and free from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Cannon v. BurrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Sullivan v. RocheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API