Legal Opinion

Lacey v. Beck

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 29, 1960No. 1064, Civil Action, 1958PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stiftel, J.:

At the conclusion of the trial in this matter, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, Richard W. Lacey, in the total amount of $12,500. Although not requested to do so, the jury brought in the verdict in two parts. The Foreman stated that the jury awarded $2,500 to the plaintiff for scars, pain and suffering, and $10,000 for permanent injuries. The defendant has no quarrel with the jury’s award of $2,500 for the scars, pain and suffering. However, the defendant complains that the verdict in the amount of $10,000 for permanent injuries to plaintiff was so grossly excessive that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. SouthwickNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  2. Jones v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. McGarvey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Bennett v. BarberSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  5. Winkler v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. AastadSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Maier v. SantucciSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API