Legal Opinion

Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. Aastad

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 17, 1970PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This appeal requires (1) re-examination of the phrase “wilful * * * disregard of the rights of others”, as used in the Delaware Guest Statute; * and (2) review of the magnitude of the compensatory and punitive awards made by the jury to the plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict of $90,000. compensatory damages and $60,-000. punitive damages. The defendants appeal.

Reference is made to the Opinion below at 262 A.2d 652, upon the defendants’ motion for new trial, for a statement of the facts and basic contentions of the parties.

I

The defendants complain that there was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  2. Gallegher v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  5. Wilson v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API