Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. Aastad
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
This appeal requires (1) re-examination of the phrase “wilful * * * disregard of the rights of others”, as used in the Delaware Guest Statute; * and (2) review of the magnitude of the compensatory and punitive awards made by the jury to the plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict of $90,000. compensatory damages and $60,-000. punitive damages. The defendants appeal.
Reference is made to the Opinion below at 262 A.2d 652, upon the defendants’ motion for new trial, for a statement of the facts and basic contentions of the parties.
I
The defendants complain that there was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Gallegher v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
- Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Wilson v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Dutton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.