Legal Opinion

Winkler v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 25, 1902No. 56PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action on the case to recover damages for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts appear in the charge of the Court.

Lore, C. J.,

charging the jury :

Gentlemen of the jury:—George E. Winkler, the plaintiff in this action, claims that on the 19th day of February, 1901, he was in the employ of the Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, the defendant, as head brakeman of the shifting crew, which was using shifting engine No. 1242 and its tender, in moving and delivering interstate commerce cars at the siding on the south side of this city, the defendant then and there being a common carrier of passengers and freight. That while coupling the tender to the next car,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barg v. BousfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Louisville & N. R. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  4. Strong v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Gahagan v. Aermotor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Lindsay v. CecchiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  3. Larrimore v. Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of Del.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  4. Lacey v. BeckSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
  5. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API