Legal Opinion
Haskins v. Palmateer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 5, 2003No. 00C-18300; A114264PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.310 - 34.730. The principal issue is whether petitioner was entitled to be discharged from parole in 1993 and, therefore, is being held unlawfully in custody. We review for errors of law, Bedell v. Schiedler, 307 Or 562, 564, 770 P2d 909 (1989), and affirm.
In 1983, petitioner was convicted of robbery in the first degree and assault in the first degree for offenses committed in 1982. He was sentenced to concurrent indeterminate sentences not to exceed 20 years. From September 1986 to May 1992, petitioner was released…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Gage v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Klamath Falls v. Environmental Quality CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alexander v. GowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Strawn v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Barrett v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Hostetter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Landwatch Lane Cnty. v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.