Legal Opinion
Walters v. Rao Electrical Equipment Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1942PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
Plaintiff sued Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc., hereinafter called general contractor and Rao Electrical Equipment Co., hereinafter called sub-contractor for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through their negligence. The general contractor served a cross-complaint against the sub-contractor upon an indemnity agreement to which reference will be made hereafter. The jury rendered a verdict against both defendants and the trial court thereafter dismissed the cross-complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment for plaintiff against the two defendants but reversed the order of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- DeHaen v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of MassachusettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Teller v. Prospect Heights HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Dudar v. Milef Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Kelly v. Diesel Construction Division of Carl A. Morse, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.