Legal Opinion
Tilcon Minerals, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
These mirror-image diversity of citizenship suits revolve around a contract entered into on December 9, 1985 (the “1985 agreement”) under which Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (“Orange”) purchased from Tilcon Minerals, Inc. (“Tilcon”) more than 200 acres (the “property”) at Stony Brook, New York. The 1985 agreement contained provisions requiring that Orange pay the cost of relocating a rock crushing plant on the property sold at locations set forth on Exhibit E to the agreement, subject to more detailed provisions concerning the site…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bruschini v. BD. OF EDUC. OF ARLINGTON CENT.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Bruschini v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Graczyk v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Pereira v. Urthbox Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Tilcon Minerals, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994