Legal Opinion

Tilcon Minerals, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 6, 1994No. Nos. 93 Civ 6132 (VLB), 93 Civ 7026 (VLB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

This dispute arises from unexpected consequences of an agreement (the “agreement”) between Tilcon Minerals, Inc. (“Tilcon”) and Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., entered into on December 9, 1985 (the “1985 agreement”) under which Orange purchased from Tilcon more than 200 acres in Stony Brook, New. York. The agreement required that Orange pay the cost of relocating a rock crushing plant on the property sold at locations set forth on an Exhibit E to the agreement, subject to more detailed provisions concerning the site of the relocation.

*238T…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National American Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria and Central Bank of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Tilcon Minerals, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Lazarus v. Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Donohue v. PicinichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API