Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2010No. CC001239970; CA A135407; SC S057583PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Defendant petitions for review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his convictions and sentences for, among other crimes, multiple counts of robbery in the first and second degrees. The Court of Appeals affirmed, citing its decision in State v. Williams, 229 Or App 79, 209 P3d 842, rev den, 347 Or 44 (2009) in which it concluded that robbery is a crime against a person and that those against whom a defendant uses physical force or whom a defendant threatens in the course of a robbery are “victims” of that robbery, justifying multiple convictions and sentences. State v. Hamilton, 229 Or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. GlaspeyOregon Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barbosa v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Eddie Strickland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Pedro Aguirre Barbosa v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API