BLACK HORSE RUN PROP. OWNERS ASSOCIATION-RALEIGH, INC. v. Kaleel
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether the Kaleels’ radio towers are “structures” within the meaning of the restrictive covenants, so that approval by plaintiff’s Architectural Control Committee was required prior to their erection. We hold that they are and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Restrictive covenants are not generally favored in the law; any ambiguities in the restrictions are to be resolved in favor of the free and unrestricted use of the land. Hobby & Son v. Family Homes, 302 N.C. 64, 274 S.E. 2d 174 (1981). Nevertheless, such covenants must be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- La Vielle v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Parker v. HoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Matter of Estate of PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Estate of Gainey v. Southern Flooring & Acoustical Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re Estate of SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.