People v. Rogler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record and consideration of the relevant factors (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 333-334, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625), we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of defendant’s application for youthful offender status (see, People v New, 171 AD2d 1006, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Ortega, 114 AD2d 912, lv denied 67 NY2d 887). Further, we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to grant him that status (cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930). Finally, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CruickshankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. Dawn Maria C.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. ShrubsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. OrtegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. NewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. DraytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000