People v. Drayton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that it is unclear whether the jury reached a unanimous verdict concerning each and every count of the indictment. Unlike the situation in People v Foreman (168 AD2d 928, lv denied 77 NY2d 994), relied upon by defendant, the multiple sex acts charged in this indictment were particularized in the People’s bill of particulars and were linked sequentially to the complainant’s testimony by the prosecutor on summation. Thus, there is an adequate basis in the record to connect the counts of the indictment to the particular…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. ShrubsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. OrtegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. ForemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CaleroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CaballeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. MathisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.