People v. New
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the People failed to establish that he had the necessary intent to commit the crimes charged in the indictment. Whether defendant was so intoxicated that he was unable to form the requisite intent to be guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted raised issues of fact and credibility for the jury to resolve (see, People v Lang, 143 AD2d 685; People v Danaher, 115 AD2d 905, 906; People v Scott, 111 AD2d 45, 46). The jury chose to resolve those issues in the People’s favor. Viewing the evidence in the light…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CruickshankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. Dawn Maria C.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. OrtegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. DanaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DraytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RoglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. StillwagonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. StillwagonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.