Legal Opinion
Abouab v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 2006No. A110940PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Appellants here, petitioners below, are Joe Abouab, Karl Plischke, and Terri Chantrelle (Petitioners). They filed a mandamus action against the City and County of San Francisco, its recorder, tax collector, and assessor (when referred to collectively, the City), seeking to compel the City to investigate an unreported change in ownership of a San Francisco property and reassess it. The reassessment happened, the upshot of which, after many years and many proceedings, was an increase in property tax revenue of some $64 million.
Petitioners made a motion seeking a determination…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Guerrero v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Parra v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of San Diego v. San Diegans for Open GovernmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan v. Oakley, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.