Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. San Diegans for Open Government
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 2016No. D068939, D069890PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.—
San Diegans for Open Government (SDOG), represented by Briggs Law Corporation (BLC), filed a verified answer in response to the City of San Diego’s (City) complaint in a validation action regarding the City’s plan to levy a special tax to finance the expansion of the San Diego Convention Center. By way of its verified answer, SDOG represented that it was an interested party to the litigation. However, at the time it filed its answer, both SDOG and its counsel knew that SDOG was a suspended corporation and neither SDOG nor its attorney informed the superior court or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hull v. RossiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- CENTER FOR SELF-IMPROVEMENT & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v. Lennar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Casiopea Bovet, LLC v. Chiang, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Casiopea Bovet, LLC v. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Frank Jorgensen v. Hows Markets, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Westlands Water Dist. v. Cal. Water Impact Network CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Westlands Water Dist. v. County of San Joaquin CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.