Legal Opinion
Parra v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 2006No. A112331PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
This case of first impression involves the application of the one-year limitation provision governing discipline of police officers contained in the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.), and particularly whether that provision was tolled or extended. The issue arises out of the investigation of, and the criminal charges filed in connection with, the notorious incident in November 2002 involving three off-duty San Francisco police officers which came to be known as “Fajitagate.”
Appellants here, petitioners below, are seven San…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Breslin v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bettencourt v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Daugherty v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Richardson v. City & County of San Francisco Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.