Legal Opinion

Mehlhorn v. Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 15, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Pima County and the Pima County Board of Supervisors appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting special action relief to appellees Norman and Petra Mehlhorn, Wayne and Adlana Mehlhorn, William and Deanna Mehlhorn, David and Marcia Christopherson, and James and Patrice Witt by ordering the Board of Supervisors to pass an ordinance changing the zoning of appellees’ real property. The County argues the trial court made erroneous factual findings, lacked jurisdiction to order a rezoning, and misapplied the rational basis test. We agree the trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Rubi v. 49'er Country Club Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Wait v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City Council v. Wendy's of Western Virginia, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  5. City of Phoenix v. OglesbyArizona Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. McLoughlin Catalina v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API