Legal Opinion

Dings v. Callahan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1979No. 50,768PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse summary judgment in a malpractice action against two lawyers, Callahan and Barrett. As the case comes before us, it is targeted at Barrett. There is no contention discovery was incomplete.

After representation by two other lawyers in a Cowley County divorce action brought by his ex-wife in 1972, plaintiff contacted Barrett in November, 1975. It appears there then remained as part of the property division issue the question of equal division of seventeen jointly owned tracts of real estate, each of which was subject to a contract for sale. Barrett was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Pete v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Pusey v. ReedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Chicago Red Top Cab Ass'n v. GainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Hiett v. BrierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Floyd v. KoskoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Hyduke v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Jablonski v. HigginsCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1983
  5. Millhouse v. Wiesenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API