Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 13, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-102; Court 01-00126PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”), moves pursuant to USCIT R. 56 for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts. Motorola contends that the merchandise at issue are classifiable as hybrid integrated circuits as a matter of law. Defendant cross-moves for summary judgment seeking an order dismissing the case.
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2000).
STANDARD OF REVIEW
On a motion for summary judgment, the Court must determine whether there are any genuine issues of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Motorola, Inc, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Motorola, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Motorola, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Kent Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.