Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 1, 2006No. 05-1025, 05-1041PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from the Court of International Trade concerns the appropriate tariff classification for eight models of circuits used in battery packs for cellular phones. Motorola imported the circuits in 1998 and declared them to Customs under subheading 8542.40.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). That subheading covers “hybrid integrated circuits” and allows such circuits to be entered duty free.
After reviewing the entries, Customs rejected Motorola’s proposed classification and liquidated the entries in October of 2000 under subheading…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Degussa Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Grapevine Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- California Industrial Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Agfa Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.