Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 13, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-165; Court 01-00126PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
This case is before the Court pursuant to a remand ordered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in Motorola, Inc. v. United States, 436 F.3d 1357 (Fed.Cir.2006)(“Mo torola II ”). Therein, the CAFC mandated that this Court determine “whether either the 900 ‘bypass’ entries or the PRLs [preclassification ruling letters] constituted ‘treatment’ within the meaning of section 1625(c)(2), as interpreted in light of 19 C.F.R. § 177.12(c)(l)(ii).” Id. at 1368. Thus, on remand, this Court will address whether the “entries at issue in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Motorola, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Kent Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Columbia Saint Mary's Hospital Milwaukee, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nucor Engineered Prods., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023