Legal Opinion
State v. Tamulonis
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 9, 2010No. 2D09-4081PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Lori Tamulonis’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from two pharmacies by a law enforcement officer. The State relies on State v. Carter, 23 So.3d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), in which the First District determined that section 893.07(4), Florida Statutes, does not require law enforcement officers to procure a search warrant or subpoena prior to obtaining controlled substance records from pharmacies. We find the reasoning in Carter persuasive and thus reverse the order granting Tamulonis’s motion to suppress.
Tamulonis was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel WageringSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Stone v. City of StowOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Douglas v. CondonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SunDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Hendley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Mullis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- State v. ShukitisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. YutzyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.