Legal Opinion
Hendley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 18, 2011No. 2D09-2890PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Judge.
Without a warrant, a subpoena, or prior notice, law enforcement officers obtained Justin Hendley’s prescription records from a pharmacy. The State charged Mr. Hendley with obtaining a controlled substance by fraud. He pleaded no contest, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress. On appeal, Mr. Hendley argues that the law enforcement officers acted impermissibly. However, because section 893.07, Florida Statutes (2008), requires pharmacists to maintain records containing controlled substances delivered by them and to make such records…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Nicolai Caymen, AKA Andre Patrick PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Hicks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. TamulonisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. LennonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jean Resnick v. AvMed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- State v. SunDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- State v. WoodromeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Jean Resnick v. AvMed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.