Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Condon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2005No. 04-2118PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Chez Douglas brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that her right to privacy was violated by a police search of her pharmacy prescription records executed pursuant to a court order. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, finding that Douglas’s right to privacy had not been violated, and that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. On appeal we must decide whether Douglas has a right to privacy in her prescription drug records, and if so, whether that right was violated by the role of the Assistant District Attorney (“ADA”) in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Kerns v. BaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Lincoln v. MaketaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Pyle v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Kerns v. Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.