Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 10, 1985No. 64793PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

477 So.2d 544 (1985)

Clifton WINFIELD, Nigel Winfield, Nikki Winfield, a Minor, by and through Her Father and Next Friend Malcolm Winfield and Frank Marano, Petitioners,

v.

DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, Robert M. Smith, Jr., and Gary Rutledge, Respondents.

No. 64793.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 10, 1985.

Milton E. Grusmark of the Law Offices of Milton E. Grusmark, North Miami, for petitioners.

Elliot H. Henslovitz, Miami, for respondents.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., David K. Miller, Chief Counsel and John Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood ServiceSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Schmitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. In re T.W.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API