Stone v. City of Stow
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
In their appeal to this court, appellants contend that R.C. 3719.13, 3719.27, and Ohio Adm.Code 4729-5-17 violate both the right of privacy and the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures found in the United States and Ohio Constitutions. For the reasons which follow, we find that the statutory and regulatory program allowing officers and pharmacy board agents to inspect prescription records withstands constitutional scrutiny, based on the record before us, and we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Appellants challenge the constitutionality of three different…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Young v. Govier & MiloneNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WiedemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.