State v. Thiel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The defendant, Kimberly Thiel, appeals her conviction in the Concord District Court (Stephen, J.) for shoplifting. RSA 644:17, II (2007) (repealed and replaced by RSA 637:3-a (Supp. 2009)). We reverse.
The trial court’s order dated June 10,2009, supports the following facts. The charged event occurred as Thiel was shopping at Wal-Mart. A videotaped recording of Thiel’s transaction was introduced at trial. On the video, Thiel was seen using scanning equipment at a check-out station to total up the merchandise she intended to purchase. She scanned several items correctly and asked for help with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. StaplesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. BergmannSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. BeaucheminSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. EULIANOSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. MosconeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.