Legal Opinion

State v. Breed

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 2, 2009No. 2007-654PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Putnam Breed, appeals his convictions following a jury trial in Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) of nine counts of fraudulent handling of recordable writings, see RSA 638:2 (2007), two counts of theft by deception, see RSA 637:4 (2007), and one count of theft by unauthorized taking, see RSA 637:3 (2007). We affirm his theft by deception convictions and reverse his convictions for theft by unauthorized taking and fraudulent handling of recordable writings.

The record supports the following facts. The defendant is a medical examiner in Massachusetts. His convictions stem from medical…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DoddsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. BeaucheminSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. BAE Systems Information v. Spacekey Components, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  5. Gennell v FedEx Corp et alDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API