Legal Opinion

Ketchum v. Crippen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, C. J.:

One Eastman held a mortgage on land in Mariposa County, and the plaintiffs held two subsequent mortgages on the same land. Eastman brought an action to foreclose his mortgage, making plaintiffs parties to the suit, as holders of the subsequent mortgages, and obtained a judgment and order of sale. Defendant Crippen, as Sheriff of Mariposa County, was proceeding to sell upon process issued on said judgment, when plaintiffs, claiming the right as holders of the subsequent mortgages, tendered to him the full amount of the judgment and costs, and also made a tender to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. FrostNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Borland v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Gregory v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Boggs v. Fowler & HargraveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Donovan v. McDevittMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Heller v. Dyerville Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ede v. HazenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Meyer v. LemleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API