Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Lemley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1929No. 6,449PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The cross-complaint states a cause of action in equity for relief against the erroneous decree of foreclosure entered in cause No. 3,289 upon the ground of mistake or excusable neglect, and the findings of the court under the evidence not only render the judgment and decree of foreclosure entered herein erroneous, but warrant a judgment in the appellant's favor.

By the sale of October 11, 1924, the judgment and decree of foreclosure entered on September 15, 1924, in cause No. 3,289, was satisfied and thereby extinguished. On this point it seems that all parties to this suit and the court as…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Raymond v. BlancgrassMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Epletveit v. SolbergMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Kosonen v. WaaraMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Occidental Life Insurance v. NiendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Rieckhoff v. WoodhullMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Eagle Watch Investments, Inc. v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API