Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Humphrey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1864PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal in chancery from Shiawassee Circuit. The facts, so far as they bear upon tbe legal questions* are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy J:

The bill was filed to foreclose two mortgages (on the same land) executed by the .defendants to William L. Coonley, both dated the 5th day of June, 1860; one for four hundred and twelve dollars and the other for two hundred dollars: both payable one year from date with interest at ten per cent. The former was assigned to complainant on the day of its date, and the latter on the 16th day of May, 1862, long after it became due. The mortgages were respectively accompanied by a promissory note for a like amount, payable in the same way, which notes were transferred to complainant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Moynahan v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Wagar v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Ladue v. Detroit & Milwaukee RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Hazeltine v. GrangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Common Council v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API