Legal Opinion

Peters v. Fenner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1972No. 43424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is' an action by the purchasers under a contract for deed to require the vendors to specifically perform the contract.

The issues are (1) whether the contract permits prepayment of the purchase price; and (2) whether the purchasers were entitled to attorneys’ fees. The trial court held that the purchasers were entitled to prepay the contract, as to which we affirm, and awarded the purchasers attorneys’fees, as to which we reverse.

The earnest money contract entered by the parties provided in part as follows:

“* * * [T]he seller, has this day sold to the buyer for the sum of Thirty-Four…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Bergquist v. KreidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Midway National Bank v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. Winston Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Bernard v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Bruggeman v. Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Chris/Rob Realty v. Chrysler Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Kruse v. PlanerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Patry v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API