Legal Opinion

Bergquist v. Kreidler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1924No. 23,766PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action for damages caused by misrepresentation, judgment was procured against only defendant, Erasmus G-. Kreidler, and he appeals. The amount of the recovery consists of two items, a portion of the rental value for two years of the real estate in question, and upwards of $800 spent by plaintiffs in attorneys’ fees and disbursements, incurred by them in litigation after their purchase of the real estate from defendants, and in an effort to enforce and protect their right to its possession. The learned trial judge ruled the latter item to be a proper element of damages and instructed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGaw v. Acker, Merrall & Condit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. First National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Schumaker v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Bibb Broom Corn Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API