Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Schneider

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1962No. 38,219PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment permanently enjoining defendants from violating a restrictive covenant against commercial activity on real property conveyed by plaintiff to defendants. The action was tried by the court without a jury.

The property in question includes three one-acre lots adjacent to, and south of, the so-called Hudson Road, being Highway No. 12, in Woodbury Township, Washington County. It appears that on October 8, 1956, the town adopted a zoning ordinance which was in effect at the time of. the transactions here in question and restricted this property to commercial use.

P…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perry v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. People v. Calvar CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Kay Construction Co. v. County Council for Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Home Life Insurance Co. of America v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bruggeman v. Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. St. Louis Park Investment Co. v. R.L. Johnson Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Peters v. FennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. B-E Construction, Inc. v. Hustad Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API