Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Massingill
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1994No. 93-01258PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge:
This case arises from an action brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) against Billy D. Massingill for the amounts owed upon two promissory notes (“Notes”) issued by Massingill and another individual to a now-defunct New Mexico bank. United States District Judge Sam R. Cummings, in a partial summary judgment order issued pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d) and upon the conclusion of a bench trial, entered judgment for the FDIC in the full amounts requested by that agency in connection with both Notes. For the reasons set forth infra, we…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ogden v. Gibraltar Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Streber v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Cherokee Pump & Equipment Inc. v. Aurora PumpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Alberty-Vélez v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión PúblicaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Bailey, Vaught, Robertson and Co. v. Remington Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Preferred Rx, Inc. v. American Prescription Plan, Inc. Ray Adiel Medivix, Inc. And American Preferred Prescription, Inc., Ronald EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.