Legal Opinion
Mooney v. County of Orange
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 2013No. G046262PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Valerie Mooney appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion of her former employer, defendant County of *868Orange (the County), for summary adjudication on her causes of action for violations of Government Code sections 31725 and 31721, subdivision (a). (All further statutory references are to the Government Code unless otherwise specified.) Mooney contends the trial court erroneously interpreted these sections in concluding neither applied to the County.
We affirm. Mooney’s claims fail as a matter of law because the undisputed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Village Nurseries v. GreenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- HM DG, Inc. v. Amini and BeizaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Taswell v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Int'l Bhd. of Boilermakers v. Nassco Holdings Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.