Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 29, 2019No. G054617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.

*911INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Shawn Bennett sued defendant Rancho California Water District (the District) for whistleblower retaliation in violation of Labor Code section 1102.5, subdivision (b).1 At the jury trial, the trial court excluded evidence showing Bennett's relationship with the District was anything other than an employment relationship. Citing an administrative law judge's prior finding Bennett had been the District's employee for purposes of retirement benefits *24eligibility through the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the trial court concluded the doctrine of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Patten v. Grant Joint Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barr v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  2. Brown v. City of InglewoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. CP III Rincon Towers, LLC. v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  4. County of Monterey v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API