Legal Opinion
Taswell v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 14, 2018No. G053960PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFybel, J.
*346INTRODUCTION
*631Plaintiff Carl Taswell, M.D., who is certified in nuclear medicine, filed a complaint against the Regents of the University of California (the Regents). Taswell alleged he was retaliated against for his whistleblowing activities regarding patient safety at the brain imaging center during his employment by the University of California, Irvine (the University). Taswell appealed from the judgment entered after the trial court granted the Regents' motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication. We reverse.
We hold that, following an administrative hearing, Taswell was not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Louie Hung Kwei Lu v. Hawaiian Gardens Casino, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eric Bahra v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Wallen Lawson v. Ppg Arch. Finishes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Afrouz Nikmanesh v. Walmart Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Alborzi v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Carroll v. Commission on Teacher CredentialingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.